“I am looking for someone to share in an adventure that I am arranging, and it’s very difficult to find anyone.”
Saturday, 8 January 2011
You should know that this is the strangest thing I've ever done!
Good afternoon.
Went to see Disney's Tangled last night; here's some (hopefully!) brief thoughts.
I generally prefer old-style Disney movies with the traditional hand drawn animation; they just seem to be more story-focussed and prettier in general than the recent splurge of computer animated films, but Tangled has gone some little way in changing my opinion. To begin with, it was pretty much an old style Disney film: complete with sheltered pretty princess singing about her desire for a 'dream' to come true... in fact, it was just old style enough for me to get the old time butterflies in the tummy that I used to get going to the movies as a little kid. And the design of the whole thing was just SO GORGEOUS! In a little girl's bedroom kind of way, but still! I did have some issues with it though... (feel free to skip my gratituous whinge fest)Firstly, the music. Alan Menken has done some brilliant lovely work: Aladdin and Beauty and the Beast, to begin with. Buuut, with Tangled, I feel, he has fallen far far below the standard set in these films. The music is mediocre and just doesn't quite feel right in many instances. Plus, the lyrics are awful - they really shouldn't have hired someone with such awful and limited experience.
And I got annoyed very quickly at how the characters' lips didn't always move whilst they were singing. It felt a bit like all those rock music montages in Shrek films awkwardly married to a proper Little Mermaid style song. I know Disney has done this before and it has worked - but not this time.
Moving on. The animation and design were amazing and I won't fuss about them - except to say that Rapunzel's head was too big... and I found this oddly distracting. Particularly since it made Flynn's pupils (in his eyes) look too small in comparison - making him look permanently shocked whenever they were in frame together. At least, that's how I felt. Haha - and now you'll have to notice it too. Sorry.
Now we get to the difficult stuff. The romance felt just a leetle bit off - watching the ads I wasn't even sure there would be any, and watching the film I kept veering towards 'yep, this is pretty intimate and... nope, not romantic' over and over; possibly a deliberately sought effect by the filmmakers, but definitely annoying. I think the fact that Rapunzel looks so darn young has a lot to do with the 'off-ness' (and when I say 'off' I don't mean 'off' like a rotten fish, I just mean 'off' as in 'off kilter') of the romance - coupled with the fact that it was mostly from her perspective - it felt a bit like a girl with a crush on an older man. Awkward.
Particularly when one thinks that the film is partially narrated by Flynn, I would have liked to see a bit more of his side of the romance. Plus, I generally prefer to see members of the opposite sex feeling insecure and lovestruck in films. Don't you?
And the movie should have been called Rapunzel! Tangled, as a title, just doesn't fit with the feel and the direction of the film, which, for all the derring-do and humour, is mostly heart.
I did love this film. I connected really well with this film. Forget my whinging, please :-)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Labels
A. A. Milne
abortion
About A Boy
action movies
ads
Agatha Christie
Alice In Wonderland
Andrew Garfield
Anglophilia
angst
Aqualung
Atonement
audible goodness
Audrey Hepburn
Babies
baby
Basil The Great Mouse Detective
BBC
Bear Grylls
Beatrix Potter
Beauty and the Beast
Bedtime stories
Benedict Cumberbatch
Bible verses of awesome
Billabong
Billy Joel
Black Books
Blackstump
books
books you are unlikely to have read
boys
Britan
Britishness
Brooke Fraser
Butlers and Valets - I want one
C. S. Lewis
Cabin Pressure
Cat
Cellos
Chameleon Circuit
chick flicks
childhood
children's books
children's television shows
Chocolat
Chocolate
Christmas
clothes
coffee
Coldplay
culture
cute asian couples
David Tennant
Dev Patel
Dick Van Dyke
Disney films
Doctor Horrible
Doctor Who
dreams
Easter
Easter Show
Emma
Enid Blyton
Excerpts
excitement
family
fanvids
Fear
Feminism
film
firefighters
Firefly
food
Freckles
freedom
friends
fun links
G. K. Chesterton
Gerald Durrell
Gilbert and Sullivan
God
good things
Gregory Peck
hair
Headache
History
home
Homeschool
hopes
hot chocolate
Howl's Moving Castle
Hugarian Rhapsody
hugs
humiliation
I love you
impudence
information
Jane Austen
Jane Austen mini-series
Japanese stuff
Jeeves and Wooster
Josh Groban
Karen and the Babes
kiddiwinks
Knitting
L. M. Montgomery
Lady Gaga
Landon Pigg - what a funny name
language
Laughter
laziness
Legolas
Les Miserable
life
lists
literature
Lord Of The Rings
love
loveliness
lovely music
Lovely Voices
Manliness
Martin Freeman
Mary Poppins
Matt Smith
me
Meet the Robinsons
Michael Bublé
Michael Crawford
Miranda
misogyny
movies
Mumford and Sons
Music
musicals
Nanowrimo
Narnia
nasty awful films
nostalgia
Old fashioned
old movies
opinions
Orthodoxy
Oscar Wilde
pain
penguins
Phantom of the Opera
pictures
Poetry
Pride and Prejudice actors who are awesome
princesses
procrastination
productivity
QI
Queen Victoria
quotes
rain
rants
Regina Spektor
reviews
Rhett and Link
Roman Holiday
romance
Romola Garai
Rowan Atkinson
S
screen caps
Secondhand Lions
Sesame Street
Sherlock
Sherlock Holmes
silliness
Simon and Garfunkel
soundtracks
Stephen Fry
Stephen Moffat...
stuff I like
stupidity
suits
tea
television - that dreaded monster
Ten Tenors
Terry Pratchett
the 90s
The Help
The Hobbit
The Princess Bride
The Whitlams
the zoo
theatre
things that make me sad
things to blog about later
thoughtlessness
three fingers
tiredness
treating fictional characters like real people
U2
uni
Vampires
videos
weddings
Why does this post have so many views?
Wind in the Willows
Winnie the Pooh
Wodehouse
words
writers
writing
you and your sneaky literary references...
YouTube
No comments:
Post a Comment