“I am looking for someone to share in an adventure that I am arranging, and it’s very difficult to find anyone.”
Tuesday, 17 May 2011
“A person is, among all else, a material thing, easily torn, not easily mended.”
Caution: contains gigantic heaps of spoilers.
On Sunday night my sister and I went down to the video shop because there was a special on: all movies $1! I couldn't be expected to pass up on a deal like that, even if the busyness of my life should presuppose the impossibility of DVD watching... We picked up a few brainless chick flicks before Tay spotted the face of one of her favourite actors on a cover. "James McAvoy," she shrieked, "let's get Atonement." In a moment of rashness, I said yes.
It only took me about a minute and a half to regret it. "I won't watch it with you," I told her. "It's MA and will probably be awkward. We'll watch Bring It On and I'll see Atonement by myself tomorrow."
I'm so glad I didn't watch this movie with my sister!
So, I sat down by myself with the DVD last night and watched the thing.
I take back what I said earlier about Love Actually. That film was, indeed, depressing and distressing to watch, but I managed to derive some enjoyment from it. I did not enjoy Atonement at all. I appreciated it. I thought it was beautifully made. The cinematography was to die for and the casting (apart from Keira Knightley. Yeuch.) was perfect.
Buuuuuut it was a horrible, excruciating experience. Why anyone would dream up such a story in the first place, let alone want to share it with the world, beats me. I love watching James McAvoy and Benedict Cumberbatch, bless them; but I don't want to watch James McAvoy write obscene letters and die horribly. I really don't want to watch Benedict Cumberbatch play a creepy rapist, even if he's such a good actor that I forgot that it was him. Ick. I don't want to see the depravity of war and child abuse and Keira Knightley's face.
Funny thing about this film: if you believe the promotional material and fan talk, it's a romantic love story. It isn't. I didn't think the love story was romantic, anyway. They're together, what, half a day before he gets carted off? This is actually pointed out at some point, but quickly handwaved. None of their so-called love story made sense, particularly that stupid and implausible scene in the library. *hits the fast forward button*
The protagonist of the story is actually the little girl, Briony. (This becomes apparent at the end of the film, though I would actually recommend that you don't watch the end of the film. So bloomin' depressing!) It's sort of weird of me, but I actually sympathised more with her than any of the other characters. Because, come on, she's a little girl! Little girls do stupid things! Stuff Cecilia, Briony suffers more.
And, really, that's what Atonement is all about. Suffering. And darn it, it's not just the characters who get to suffer. I aged about three years in the duration of this film.
So, yeah. It was pretty, had a lovely soundtrack, kudos to the director for good directing... but I hated it. A pretty stupid story all round.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Labels
A. A. Milne
abortion
About A Boy
action movies
ads
Agatha Christie
Alice In Wonderland
Andrew Garfield
Anglophilia
angst
Aqualung
Atonement
audible goodness
Audrey Hepburn
Babies
baby
Basil The Great Mouse Detective
BBC
Bear Grylls
Beatrix Potter
Beauty and the Beast
Bedtime stories
Benedict Cumberbatch
Bible verses of awesome
Billabong
Billy Joel
Black Books
Blackstump
books
books you are unlikely to have read
boys
Britan
Britishness
Brooke Fraser
Butlers and Valets - I want one
C. S. Lewis
Cabin Pressure
Cat
Cellos
Chameleon Circuit
chick flicks
childhood
children's books
children's television shows
Chocolat
Chocolate
Christmas
clothes
coffee
Coldplay
culture
cute asian couples
David Tennant
Dev Patel
Dick Van Dyke
Disney films
Doctor Horrible
Doctor Who
dreams
Easter
Easter Show
Emma
Enid Blyton
Excerpts
excitement
family
fanvids
Fear
Feminism
film
firefighters
Firefly
food
Freckles
freedom
friends
fun links
G. K. Chesterton
Gerald Durrell
Gilbert and Sullivan
God
good things
Gregory Peck
hair
Headache
History
home
Homeschool
hopes
hot chocolate
Howl's Moving Castle
Hugarian Rhapsody
hugs
humiliation
I love you
impudence
information
Jane Austen
Jane Austen mini-series
Japanese stuff
Jeeves and Wooster
Josh Groban
Karen and the Babes
kiddiwinks
Knitting
L. M. Montgomery
Lady Gaga
Landon Pigg - what a funny name
language
Laughter
laziness
Legolas
Les Miserable
life
lists
literature
Lord Of The Rings
love
loveliness
lovely music
Lovely Voices
Manliness
Martin Freeman
Mary Poppins
Matt Smith
me
Meet the Robinsons
Michael Bublé
Michael Crawford
Miranda
misogyny
movies
Mumford and Sons
Music
musicals
Nanowrimo
Narnia
nasty awful films
nostalgia
Old fashioned
old movies
opinions
Orthodoxy
Oscar Wilde
pain
penguins
Phantom of the Opera
pictures
Poetry
Pride and Prejudice actors who are awesome
princesses
procrastination
productivity
QI
Queen Victoria
quotes
rain
rants
Regina Spektor
reviews
Rhett and Link
Roman Holiday
romance
Romola Garai
Rowan Atkinson
S
screen caps
Secondhand Lions
Sesame Street
Sherlock
Sherlock Holmes
silliness
Simon and Garfunkel
soundtracks
Stephen Fry
Stephen Moffat...
stuff I like
stupidity
suits
tea
television - that dreaded monster
Ten Tenors
Terry Pratchett
the 90s
The Help
The Hobbit
The Princess Bride
The Whitlams
the zoo
theatre
things that make me sad
things to blog about later
thoughtlessness
three fingers
tiredness
treating fictional characters like real people
U2
uni
Vampires
videos
weddings
Why does this post have so many views?
Wind in the Willows
Winnie the Pooh
Wodehouse
words
writers
writing
you and your sneaky literary references...
YouTube
Most definitely agree with all of the above!
ReplyDelete